Yes, and we have more “jologs” discussions on blogs

In: Politics and Society

1 Mar 2007

Now I don’t want to use the term “Jolographing” (and the other derivational words stemming from the word, “Jolography”) to describe what blogger have been recently doing in fear of Sir Paolo Manolo and his hardcore Jolography minions (which, incidentally were my creative writing batchmates in the English department). Hehe.

Anyway, we have yet a few more contributions to the growing inputs from bloggers on the topic of “jologs.”

Vince Racoma posted his take with his cursory descriptions of “jologs”.

Now I see that he comes from the same school that I and Angelo call our “high school alma mater.” I remember back in the day “jologs” had variations of the word squatter – skwater, sqH20 (yes, as in eytsch-too-oh = water), squa-qua, skwating… So I guess today, it’s just jologs. I mean we had “jologs” but we didn’t use it too liberally.

I think we just used barok to label someone who can’t sport the accent when speaking English. Heard anyone say, “Oi, pare, we have to finish the project so we better make pulong at Starbucks mam’ya“? (Remember, the R’s non-rhotic sounding like “pawe“) But honestly, no one in class spoke that way.

Tsk, I know all the Jesuits will be frowning at how socially irresponsible their supposedly 5-Cs laden gentlemen have become. Hehehe. I wonder if there was anyone in our batch who joined them.

Sexy Mom Dine Racoma (guess the relation) also posted her take on the matter with “Jologs”, What Does It Mean?

So there we go. A healthy and welcome string of discussions. I wonder who’s next to post a take.

Check out these other posts:

  1. “Jologs” and Pinoy rock
  2. Beware of what you wear: more on “jologs”
  3. Loverage 3 aftermath: Condemning the jologs
  4. Diskurso sa kulturang jologs versus the middle-class mindset ng Pinoy Web 2.0
  5. I’m not “jologs,” Aym a sertipayd MaK Dadi!

13 Responses to Yes, and we have more “jologs” discussions on blogs

Avatar

sexy mom

March 1st, 2007 at 9:09 am

truth is, i more confused now as to what this “jologs” word is all about, and i hear it everywhere…sigh…

Avatar

Alex

March 1st, 2007 at 9:23 am

Hi, sexy mom!

I left a comment on your blog re: Paolo Manalo’s essay on the definitions of “jologs.”

But I guess, no one really knows the pinpoint etymology or definition but as for my take, it’s a social construct. But then again, every acceptable word in any language is such.

Oh my, now I’m just as confused. Haha. No, honestly, it depends on the group of people who uses it. As far as Pinoy bloggers are concerned, these would be what Ade Magnaye and Vince are describing.

It seems to be related to things of the masa appeal that make some people (particularly from middle to upper classes) cringe and wonder what the heck happened to the society at large. Just my take.

Avatar

ba

March 1st, 2007 at 9:25 am

Nasaan na ang 5Cs?? Nasaaaaaaaaaaaaan? Hahaha.

Avatar

sexy mom

March 1st, 2007 at 9:27 am

people have come up with a various meanings of “jologs”, good, bad, so so, extremes, etc.

as to the extremes, it’s so sad. if that is “jologs”, i guess instead of frowning at them, someone has to take initiative in helping these young people get out of their being “jologs”, like giving them better constructive things to do, rehabilitating them when needed, so that when they grow up, they could have a positive contribution to society.

Avatar

Alex

March 1st, 2007 at 9:44 am

@BA

Gone! Gone are the 5-Cs! Haha. They might just revoke our diplomas!

@sexy mom

Yes, it is sad. But media has got a lot to do with them. Most of them, I think, are just rebels without causes. Free expression is something different from jumping into the spiked-hair-pierced-ear bandwagon.

It’s with the upbringing too. I mean I do believe that none of guys in your home have large ear-piercings where a whole 5 peso can fit, right?

And you can’t even say that it’s because of poverty. Where do they get the money to buy all those faddish accessories? Let’s say Vince is right that they don’t wash their clothes but a single pair of baggy pants from Dickies don’t come cheap (and you do really hear that those items are “Orijinal ‘to, tsong!”.

It believe it’d take much more than rehabs to make things work for these kids.

Avatar

ade

March 1st, 2007 at 1:33 pm

I wonder who’s next to post a take.

That would be me. :P

Avatar

Alex

March 1st, 2007 at 4:46 pm

Go, Ade! Go!

Avatar

Vince

March 1st, 2007 at 9:03 pm

I guess the 5C’s will remain on the walls of each classroom in the AHS. But we do instill these unconsciously, or so I hope :P

Avatar

Alex

March 2nd, 2007 at 6:04 am

Yes, I believe most Ateneans still know how to practice most of these 5Cs in flashes of brilliance I guess. Hehehe. :D

Avatar

Atheista | Jologs-Fixated

March 3rd, 2007 at 10:07 pm

[...] his work also set off a deluge of similarly themed articles that either showed all out disdain, pure amusement and a perfect opportunity to make fun of one’s [...]

Avatar

Nino Gonzales

March 10th, 2007 at 4:01 pm

I found the jologs phenomenon quite interesting as well… in fact I wrote a “study” on it… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nino_Gonzales/jologs

Avatar

Alex

March 11th, 2007 at 7:44 am

Great take, Nino!

There are many ways to approach the study of “jologs.” But in my opinion it’s best to be tackled through a critical discourse analysis framework that uses a cross-disciplinary approach to it.As a word, the framework should include a linguistic, sociological, and anthropological bases to it, discussing how “jologs” came to be, how it is used, how people perceive it, how the socio-cultural background affects the whole process of user.

I think what’s difficult in doing a study about “jologs” in this point in time is the fact that it has evolved to a far more complex concept than to label the masa. That even Sir Paolo’s etymologies can’t quite hold them anymore.

Avatar

Nino Gonzales

March 31st, 2007 at 11:24 am

I think you are right. You are the 2nd blogger to tell me that the scope of the study–Jologs–has grown beyond the definition I used (Paolo Manalo’s). Since I’m too lazy to enlarge the “study,” I’ll just specify my scope better. When I have the time, I’ll update the first section to “Scope: Jologs as the Poor Urban Youth of Manila.”

I’m also interested in seeing a critical discourse analysis of the jologs. I saw your taglish article on this. I agree. The jologs discourse is a discourse of the middle-class. Let me be more specific: it is the discourse of the Manilenyo middle class. As you pointed out (and I did as well in the study), practically all discussions of jologs are from people belonging to the middle class of Manila.

Here’s a snippent what I posted in Paolo Manalo’s blog regarding this:
“One of the more important assertions that the study makes is on the evolution of the term, which reflects the evolution of the concept of Jologs. I am getting more and more convinced that Jologs is a creation of the middle-class, if I may borrow what seems to be a generally accepted delineation of Manila sub-cultures: upper-class, middle-class and lower-class; or the more PC Market AB, Market C and Market DE.

The word seems to be an exact fit of how the C views the DE, particularly its youth. The mixture of contempt and affection which the word Jologs seems to carry seems to be a reflection on how the middle-class views the Jologs. On one hand, it is clear that it has (or had) a derogatory meaning, reflecting the scorn of the educated and established on the hoi polloi. On the other hand, the same people seem to also identify with the Jologs. I think this is because the CD&E are sharers of pinoy pop culture. Isn’t the familiarity with Sharon Cuneta, That’s Entertainment and Eat Bulaga the unmistakable signs of kajologan? And aren’t these exactly the things that the CD&E have in common?

Jologs, I think, is a middle-class paradigm. When one studies the Jologs, I think one will end up knowing more about the creator of the Jologs rather than the Jologs themselves. When one looks at a painting, wouldn’t one know more about the painter rather than the subject? And since meanings and paradigms are not static, a deeper study of the Jologs will also show the evolution of how the middle looks at the lower.”
http://paolomanalo.blogspot.com/2006/02/jologs-on-wikipedia.html

Comment Form

About this blog

Hi! I'm Alex, a 20-something blogger writing about the discourses of social media. Once in a while I still let slip posts about the mundane, the asinine, and the trivial. Feel free to contact me.

Categories

Archives

  • Alex: Hi Edzee. Sorry for the very late reply. It seems like you have to bring that up with Globe. If your [...]
  • EdZee: I have a 384Kbps Globe Broadband subscription for P995 in the past 36 months and I only learned abou [...]
  • Ethel: Mr. Dave Barnedo....Is this the same Mr. Barnedo who's Dad was hospitalized at UST Hospital during t [...]
  • NO to Large Class Policy on UPLB! « The Blue Ninja: [...] Breaking the Carabao’s Back ni Alex Maximo [...] [...]
  • Mark: Try nyo ahh [...]

Words of Wisdom

I know what you’re thinking. “Did he fire six shots or only five?” Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you’ve got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk? — Harry Callahan, Dirty Harry

Topics

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

All brand names, logos and images are copyright of their respective owners. Site owner is not liable for any comments made on this site. Grammar Nazis will be hanged, drawn, and quartered. If what is found here is not to your liking, feel free to visit another website.

Meta

who's online Add to Technorati Favorites Risha for Life button link Personal blogs & blog posts Personal - Top Blogs Philippines